International Jump Tekken Tournament 2

____________________________ REGISTER CLOSE : 10.04.2016

You are not logged in.

#1 2016-05-02 11:39:49

Laciaty
Administrator/Admin
Registered: 2016-03-20
Posts: 79
Windows 7Opera 36.0.2130.65

Offline

#2 2016-05-07 20:21:03

Owl
Jumper
Registered: 2016-03-21
Posts: 3
Windows 7Firefox 46.0

Offline

#3 2016-05-08 14:55:20

RuDolf Christ A
Jumper
Registered: 2016-05-08
Posts: 1
Windows 8.1Firefox 44.0

Offline

#4 2016-05-15 21:59:38

Wilku
Sędzia/Judge
Registered: 2016-05-15
Posts: 23
Windows 7Chrome 50.0.2661.102

Re: Rudolf vs Owl

Owl 5/10
Ładnie w bit i dostosowales sie do muzyczki. Całkiem energicznie. Popracuj nad górnymi partiami, bo jumpstyle to nie tylko nogi ale i rece i tors i nie garb sie tak a bedzie duzo przyjemniej sie ogladalo
Rudolf 5/10
Dynamic is on high level but you forget about finishing moves correctly. Dont wathc your feet just watch ahead. Work on technique

Offline

#5 2016-05-17 23:26:57

Radnaro
Sędzia/Judge
Registered: 2016-03-27
Posts: 42
WindowsChrome 50.0.2661.102

Re: Rudolf vs Owl

Owl: 6.5 / 10
Fajnie zatańczone do nutki. Wykorzystałeś  wszystkie kicki za co duży plus.
Brakuje mi u cb jeszcze takiej płynności. Podnoś też wyżej nogi przy stampie bo odbiega energicznie od reszty.

Rudolf: 6 /10
Also, well-danced to the music but opponent danced a little better. Your jump it is still chaotic.
Refine some tricks and improve controls in dance.

Last edited by Radnaro (2016-05-17 23:27:23)

Offline

#6 2016-05-31 07:36:51

Jelle
Sędzia/Judge
Registered: 2016-03-21
Posts: 25
Windows 7Chrome 50.0.2661.102

Re: Rudolf vs Owl

Rudolf: 7.25
Owl: 6.50

Rudolph is much more flexible, energetic in the moves and beats Owl on complexity, there isn't much difference in technique tho.
I don't see how he got a draw with Owl in this battle, with all the respect to Owl [sred])

Last edited by Jelle (2016-05-31 07:37:02)

Offline

Registered users online in this topic: 0, guests: 1
[Bot] ClaudeBot

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB
Modified by Visman

[ Generated in 0.030 seconds, 8 queries executed - Memory usage: 658.8 KiB (Peak: 759.03 KiB) ]