International Jump Tekken Tournament 2

____________________________ REGISTER CLOSE : 10.04.2016

You are not logged in.

#1 2016-05-02 11:42:14

Laciaty
Administrator/Admin
Registered: 2016-03-20
Posts: 79
Windows 7Opera 36.0.2130.65

E-ZANY vs Oitap

E-ZANY

Oitap

Offline

#2 2016-05-10 10:07:37

Ezani Azuan
Jumper
Registered: 2016-03-23
Posts: 2
Windows 7Chrome 48.0.2564.116

Re: E-ZANY vs Oitap

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8AklPVa7Jg sorry for video quality :')

Offline

#3 2016-05-10 11:40:10

Oitap
Jumper
Registered: 2016-04-10
Posts: 1
WindowsChrome 50.0.2661.94

Offline

#4 2016-05-15 19:47:04

Wilku
Sędzia/Judge
Registered: 2016-05-15
Posts: 23
Windows 7Chrome 50.0.2661.102

Re: E-ZANY vs Oitap

E-ZANY 6/10
I like when jumper used other jumpstyle like complex u used. Nice energy. Focus on technique and try record at the day and better camera.

Oitap 6/10
Skądś znam tą miejscówke ;p Patio wyzej nogi i dociagaj tricki przy np kneekicku i nagraj cos nowego !

Offline

#5 2016-05-18 23:54:57

Radnaro
Sędzia/Judge
Registered: 2016-03-27
Posts: 42
WindowsChrome 50.0.2661.102

Re: E-ZANY vs Oitap

E-ZANY: 5.5 / 10
You have good start but the second half of solo was weaker and you lost beat.
Some tricks are underdeveloped.

Oitap: 5.5 / 10
Jakbyś nagrał coś świeżego to prawdopodobnie byś wygrał, a takto daje remis. Troche do kitu oceniac to co tańczyłeś kiedys ale no napewno
wyżej nogi, spin na końcu mizerny a kombinacje dosyć podstawowe. Technika i  płynnosć ok.

Offline

#6 2016-05-31 06:52:53

Jelle
Sędzia/Judge
Registered: 2016-03-21
Posts: 25
Windows 7Chrome 50.0.2661.102

Re: E-ZANY vs Oitap

Oitap: 6.25
E-Zany: 6

Oitap, that video is stretched like russians do, please put something better next round
Oitap has better technique, but 1/10 creativity, I can't really say E-Zany was original either.
Both offbeat.. (E-Zany 0:31-0:34 don't look nice)

Offline

Registered users online in this topic: 0, guests: 1
[Bot] ClaudeBot

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB
Modified by Visman

[ Generated in 0.019 seconds, 9 queries executed - Memory usage: 640.73 KiB (Peak: 734.21 KiB) ]